Miscellaneous Writings
- May 7
- 6 min read
Updated: May 11
Here is a compilation of some of my favorite things I've written. All is created under my system of logic and is copyright and trademarked under my brand.
My Use of the Term Metaphysics
A couple of years ago, I started using the term metaphysics in place of the word, word, which I regret trying to do. The logic was that all words are a description of physics in some extended way under a hard deterministic view.
This was bad and not productive. I change it where I see it but I haven't changed it everywhere yet.
No Thing is Any Thing Nothing is Anything
No thing is any thing until I look.
Nothing can be anything until we look.
No thing is any thing unless I feel.
Nothing can be anything unless we feel.
No thing is any thing until I think.
Nothing can be anything until we think.
No thing is any thing unless I see. (Schema)
Nothing can be anything unless we see.
No thing is any thing until I decide.
Nothing can be anything until we decide. (Rule Consequentialism)
The Irrelevance of Choice
When we are faced with a decision. We instantly start creating schemas based on the rule consequentialism we and society have put in place and the previous schemas created. Every choice we ever make has an influence on those schemas. In some ways, the choices we make are irrelevant to the choice we make, the schemas are created as soon as we have to think to make the choice. Marketing takes advantage of this with its persistence and deception. Some current marketing practices create an irrelevance of choice. It is subconscious, value spectrum, manipulative trickery. It is disgusting and evil.
In my studies of business, the justification for much of our marketing practices has been that we want to “present the business as we wish it to be seen by the consumer”. This line of thinking is pure idealism and unethical. This creates grounds for a business to justify lying about what their business or product actually is. Marketing practices need to be taken down and broken into more realistic representations of their products or businesses.
Businesses exist to fill a want or a need. Many marketing practices take advantage of this fact and make many of our wants feel like needs. We don’t really need much of anything. Food, water, shelter, and authenticity. The lack of authenticity in society is where marketing needs to fucking change.
Seems and Feels
Among the scientific community, the words “seems” and “feels”, seem to have a sharp, negative connotation. This feels correct. Is that objectively written anywhere? If, going by what seems or feels correct is incorrect, how do we figure anything out? Choosing to view these words with a negative connotation is paradoxically going by what seems and feels correct. It is a loop of logic and is backward. It contributes to the void. It is not seeing the spectrum of metaphysics which is the crucial end to the spectrum of the scientific method and being “correct”.
To be clear, we are inevitably objectively bad at going by what seems and feels correct, that is what this entire writing is about. Also, of course, math and technology are what we should use for objective reasoning, but every single thing we do is initiated by a spectrum of previously created schemas of reality. We don’t psychologically ever have the option to not do what seems or feels “correct”. Our metacognition just has to correct delusions created by what seems or feels correct. Physics is all that is “correct”.
Going by that initiation of what seems or feels correct and the curiosity inspired by it, is the heart of all of science. It is seeing entropy and trying to make sense of the impossible. It is what sparks our metacognition. Scientists are masters of what seems and feels correct and finding the accurate sources of entropy in our reality. Scientists are the conductors of our universe and the key to making it more beautiful. What seems and feels correct is the origin of entropy in our psychology, curiosity. Curiosity is beautiful. We make it disgusting by trying to control what seems and feels correct. It is the inhibition of curiosity that inhibits metacognition. It is the real problem of education in general.
These words are on a spectrum and they are important skills to understand, rather than ways of explaining. Scientists are ironically sometimes too objective in their use of metaphysics. There is no true agreement on what is, other than physics, it’s impossible and absurd. This entire writing is inspired by some insatiable urge of what seems and feels correct. That is why it is accurate. I just know that that is an impossible task to be objective about. That is also what this entire writing is about. What seems and feels correct is pretty darn important for thinking and curiosity, it is the prerequisite.
One thought to add to this which is important as an example of doing it wrong. If your seems and feels lead you to think the earth is flat, you're doing it wrong. If the earth seems flat to you, you need to work on your seems and feels.
The Existence of Evil
There are many ideas of what evil is and if it exists. If it didn’t exist at all, physically or metaphysically, we would not have a need for the word. So there is great reason to explore how we can concretely look at it. If we assume that absolute morality exists, then evil is simply anything morally bad or wrong existing at a degree to which we are all uncomfortable enough to agree. That is still incredibly vague though. It creates no distinction between bad and evil. It requires us to know what is relatively morally bad or wrong, which still leaves the question of whether or not evil exists. If we assume that morality is created, then evil is much clearer. If morality is created, then nothing is inherently evil, evil is created. What is the process that creates evil then? Evil must be created through the moral and ethical standards we set. This still brings back the question of absolute morality and whether the standards or, rule consequentialism, we create are accurate, they’re not. The difference though, is if we create those standards, we implicitly create a standard on which evil can exist. Therefore, evil is directly created because we have expectations of what morality is. More specifically, evil is created when a process is expected to work but doesn’t, so objectively immoral actions inevitably occur. This leads to consequentialist thinking because we create a preconceived notion and expectation for how a process is supposed to work. Everyone is incredibly different though. Would evil exist without consequentialism?
Campbell’s law is equal to evil. Evil has become commonplace and normalized, particularly in the business sector through the increased demand and diversification of “results” and “success”. In many workplaces, there are commonly incorrectly high values placed on various measures of accountability creating incorrect value schemas in each of our relative paradigms. Campbell’s law comes into play when the relative circumstances prevent an individual from meeting the expectation set. The individual is inevitably forced to commit relatively immoral actions in order to meet that expectation. This is evil. Evil is forcing one to commit an act that would commonly be considered immoral. The relative spectrum of evil is how immoral the action being forced is. Everyone inevitably commits some kind of immoral action nearly every day on some kind of relative spectrum. We are highly imperfect and do not perceive everything. Forcing others to do so is a different category of bad, it is evil. Lying would be the most common immoral action being forced by Campbell’s law. Lying can create an exponential chain of cognitive dissonance. I consider much of our marketing practices today as greatly evil through lies, mass subconscious cognitive dissonance. What is considered a lie, also exists on a spectrum. This directly ties in to and connects with our cognitive dissonance and mental health spectrums.
This definition of evil perfectly correlates and explains why Hitler and the Nazi party were the most evil humans I am aware of. I am an epistemological cynic though and wander about what I or we don’t know about history. I wonder if there is someone worse we haven’t accounted for. This definition of evil also explains the importance of people in the spotlight representing at least decent qualities. Cancel culture is also evil though. Influence can quickly turn evil. Influence is the rule consequentialism of evil.
Racism and Antisemitism
Racism seems to have one origin of entropy which needs to stop getting perpetuated. A misunderstanding and fear of that which is different. A weak, holding onto of an egotistical self serving delusion. This origin of entropy is the influence of evil. Racism is evil. Objectively. This schema gets perpetuated further as more origins of entropy are created by a passing along of this void of entropy.
I hold a different meaning for the word retarded than most in my mind. In my mind, retarded, is something which slows down the forward progression of society in general, contributing to the void. Racism is evil and retarded. To end racism, we have to end it. Stop being retarded. All colors are beautiful. This is a societal schema that can and should end.
I can’t see the psychology between racism and antisemitism being much different. All of the isms which target out a particular group hold a similar psychology.
Comments